The IMF asks to focus on the most vulnerable aid against increases in energy and food | Economy

Neither general subsidies nor indiscriminate tax cuts to deal with the rise in energy and food. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has called on governments this Wednesday to focus aid on the most vulnerable layers of the population, avoiding actions that may have “undesired consequences and high fiscal cost” at a time of “high uncertainty” about the Public finances. The notice comes at an especially critical time, after two consecutive crises – the financial crisis of 2008 and the coronavirus crisis of 2020 – that have reduced income and triggered debt levels throughout the globe. For this reason, the Fund warns about the scarce fiscal margin of some countries, which could be further narrowed if the central banks raise rates in the coming months.

“Many of the measures announced so far have not been targeted, such as fuel subsidies, and will contribute to increasing fiscal deficits, as has already happened in previous episodes of rising raw material prices,” says the multilateral organization in its latest update your Tax Monitor. “Widespread subsidies are costly, drive out productive spending, reduce incentives for producers, lead to overconsumption and, in the specific case of energy, disproportionately benefit higher-income households,” he criticizes.

A good part of the steps taken by governments to try to alleviate this blow, the Fund’s economists allege, are preventing domestic prices of energy and food products “from adjusting and this can exacerbate the imbalances between global supply and demand, putting even more pressure on international prices, causing shortages and especially harming lower-income countries, which have less fiscal space.” On the contrary, they emphasize, “allowing the rise in international prices to be transferred to the domestic level would create the right incentives to adjust demand (for example, promoting a more efficient use of energy) and supply (increasing investment in renewable energy or food production).

He knows in depth all the sides of the coin.


To reinforce its argument, the body commanded by Kristalina Georgieva uses a recent experience: that of the pandemic. “Fiscal policy has a role to play when things go wrong, shielding the most vulnerable from the impact on family budgets. (…) As in 2020 and 2021, governments must act to protect people. But, as then, it is also crucial that the policies chosen are temporary, selective and temporary given the limited fiscal space and the increased risks to public finances”, she stresses. On Monday, also within the framework of its traditional spring meeting, the IMF suggested to governments that they apply temporary tax increases to companies with “excessive profits”.

The double face of inflation on public accounts

The clearly rising price environment has two aspects for public finances. On the one hand, generalized rises in inflation constitute one of the most recurrent and effective mechanisms for reducing indebtedness. This is how history dictates it and this is also how the Fund recognizes it this Wednesday: “It is true that inflationary surprises contribute to reducing debt ratios”. According to his calculations, this “inflationary surprise” has already reduced the public debt of rich countries by 1.8 percentage points and that of their emerging peers, by 4.1. However, he adds, this relief is not only “usually temporary” but “in a regime of permanent high inflation, the attractiveness of sovereign bonds would be undermined, complicating the maintenance of high levels of debt.”

The treasuries, especially in advanced economies, the IMF technicians conclude, “must pay attention” to this new inflationary reality: “The fiscal outlook continues to be subject to high uncertainty, given that the full consequences of the war and the sanctions about Russia remain unknown and variable between countries”, he warns. “There are big risks, both on the deficit horizon and on the debt horizon, especially if economic growth disappoints or if inflation dynamics continue to surprise.”

Although it is still impossible to know the full extent of the effects, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is already becoming apparent in the treasuries of the eurozone: if, before the offensive, the primary deficits (a metric that already discounts the interest on the debt) of the The countries of the euro pointed to an average reduction of around 2.5% of GDP in 2022, now that reduction will remain at approximately one percentage point, according to the Fund’s projection, which already includes both the increase in spending expected due to the war and the downward revision of growth forecasts.

Debt decline is similarly held back, both by the sudden worsening of macroeconomic conditions and by growing pressure for central banks to speed up the withdrawal of stimulus and raise interest rates earlier than expected. In Spain, this will go from the peak of 120% in 2020 to just under 115% in 2024; in the eurozone, from 97% to 92%; and in the world as a whole, from 123% to 113%.

Exclusive content for subscribers

read without limits

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button